muledeerregions

wafwalogo

Home

WAFWA Mule Deer Working Group

What's in a Name?

Of Shipwrecks and Captives

The West that Was . . . No Longer Is

Losing Ground

The Mounting Pressure of Development

A Place for Predators

Precipitation - A Driving Force

Wilderness Breakup

Elk and Mule Deer Interactions

Mule Deer Regions - No Two are Alike

Plant Communities in Trouble . .

Mule Deer Diseases

Supplemental Feeding - Just Say No

Learning By Doing

Managing Deer Herds with Harvest

Our Summary

WAFWA

Precipitation - a Driving Force

It doesn’t seem possible that raindrops or snowflakes would affect the ability of mule deer to thrive. But in fact, precipitation is a key factor that drives mule deer populations.

The amount and timing of precipitation affects plant growth and quality, deer diet and nutrition, the ability of a habitat to support a population of deer, distribution and movement of deer, predation and management. Also, extreme weather such as droughts, prolonged periods of extreme cold or excessive snow can directly cause mule deer mortality.

Plant growth and quality

Precipitation affects soil moisture, ambient temperatures and annual plant growing seasons, all of which affect the plants that mule deer eat on winter and summer ranges. In desert environments, precipitation is critical for new spring growth. In northern climates, severe winters with large amounts of snowfall may increase mortality because deer do not have access to food.

Habitat and Deer Nutrition

Mule deer eat browse tips, forbs and grasses, although their diet is primarily shrubs. How much of each kind of food a mule deer eats is directly related to the availability of it in the environment. During years of normal rainfall, deer may feed primarily on nutrient-rich deciduous shrubs. In years of drought, they may eat mostly evergreen and drought-resistant plants.

Group of mule deer bedded in deep snow in Colorado. By Len Carpenter.Extremes in precipitation can directly affect the ability of mule deer to eat nutritious foods. For example, deep snow can reduce availability of forage in northern climates, while drought can lessen availability of forbs and grasses in desert environments.

Inadequate precipitation reduces the availability, annual growth, digestibility and quality of important plants, and forces deer to eat more food with less nutritional value. Each of these affects energy levels and the overall ability of a habitat to support a mule deer population.

If winter and spring precipitation are low and there is little new growth of plants, deer are forced to eat older plants that have less nutritional value and are more difficult to digest. Poor forage can delay the age at which deer become sexually mature. Poor nutrition makes it difficult for does to successfully rear fawns because of the inability to provide adequate milk during lactation. Even if fawns survive, their small size may make them more susceptible to predation, or the rigors of winter.

Severe winters with significant snowfall and cold temperatures may lead to malnutrition of deer, resulting in fewer fawns produced, and a higher than average death of fawns and adults.

Drought is a long-term, natural, cyclic event that is linked to declines in mule deer populations, particularly in arid regions. Both seasonal and long-term droughts can affect the survival of deer fawns. In general, higher levels of rainfall correlate to improved production, whereas lower levels of rainfall have been associated with declines in production and numbers of mule deer.

Distribution and Movement of Deer

Precipitation influences the distribution and movements of mule deer in northern, cooler climates and drier, desert climates. Home ranges of mule deer increase with a decrease in quality habitat because the animals need to range farther to meet their nutritional needs.

During severe winters with deep snowfall, deer may be crowded on small winter ranges, unable to travel through deep snow to meet their nutritional needs. Providing good cover to help deer conserve energy is critical during severe winters. In desert environments, plant density and rainfall seem to be good predictors of distribution and productivity.

In mountainous regions, seasonal migrations are based on availability of food resources. Snowstorms cause deer to migrate in fall, while migrations from winter to summer ranges occur with lush, spring growth and receding snowlines.

In mountainous regions with less severe climates, migration may be closely associated with changes in relative humidity.

Predation

Interactions between predators and prey are related to the ability of a habitat to support a population of deer, weather, human use patterns, the type of predator and changes in habitat. For example, during drought periods in Texas, mule deer numbers are below carrying capacity, and predation by mountain lions may be significant.

Disease

Little scientific research exists to suggest there is a direct relationship between spread of disease in deer and precipitation. Deer may concentrate around water during dry, hot summers, however it is more likely that drought causes poor nutrition in deer, leading to greater susceptibility to disease.

Pollution

Acid precipitation can damage foliage and roots of vegetation and destroy soil nutrients and organisms, resulting in greater susceptibility to disease, drought, and frost, and reduced germination and seedling survival. Acid precipitation may also lower trace minerals in forage, an important component in the diet of ungulates.

Management

Deer populations may be managed with greater accuracy by making correlations between climate and survival of deer fawns. Mean snow depth, ambient temperatures, wind speed, drought severity index and several other climatic factors can help managers predict fawn survival, particularly in extreme desert scrub and montane conifer environments.


Mule Deer, Changing Landscapes, Changing Perspectives, is a series of non-technical articles based on technical papers from the book, “Mule Deer Conservation: Issues and Management Strategies” Published by The Berryman Institute, Utah State University.

The contents of this web page may be photocopied or reprinted for noncommercial purposes using the citation listed below:

Mule Deer Working Group. 2003. Mule Deer: Changing landscapes, changing perspectives. Mule Deer Working Group, Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies.